Do you really need an I-phone 7 ?



But here's the biggest question: Do you need an iPhone 7 or iPhone 7 Plus?
Nope. Oh, you may want a better phone ... but you're unlikely to need a better phone.Or in many cases, need a better anything -- other than a better you.It's easy to assume adopting new technology is the key to success. But chasing new technology is a waste of time when you spend more time searching for improved "stuff" than you do on working to improve yourself.Here's a good example: cycling. The use of carbon fiber and advanced aerodynamics has made bicycles incredibly sophisticated -- and expensive. Go to a triathlon, even an entry-level "sprint" triathlon, and you'll see hundreds of $6,000, $8,000, and $10,000 bikes. Even the most casual of competitors spend thousands of dollars pursuing incremental performance gains. High-tech is the norm, not the exception.
A couple years ago I did a triathlon with a friend who is 1) a professional cyclist and 2) way too candid. A group formed around him in the staging area. One of the participants, a rather portly gentleman, talked about buying a $9,000 bike.
"A lighter bike will definitely be worth it," the man declared, obviously confident a pro cyclist who rides the most cutting of cutting-edge bikes would agree.
"Oh, hell no," my friend said. "If I were you, I wouldn't waste money on a lighter bike. You'd be a lot better off if you just lost 10 or 20 pounds."
And that was the end of that conversation.

http://www.inc.com/jeff-haden/why-you-dont-need-a-new-iphone-7-but-you-really-do-need-a-better-you.html


I couldn't agree more, you don't need more stuff more gadgets more upgrades. What you need is a better you. how do you do it? do a little better today vs yesterday. improve a bit . that will take you a long way but it's not easy to beat yourself. In cycling i work with one of the best Portuguese coaches and we try to improve just a bit every year. It's not easy. why? because last year i was already working hard. 

About gadgets i always think about the US, everything is old, infrastructure, 2G, still using Blackberries, etc... and despite this they are the best. Even Boeing is less tech than AIRBUS but they do equally well or better.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can. 

Arthur Ashe
Image result for improve yourself

Brexit is good after all

 Source: @fasFT


Obviously that BREXIT is going to be good for the UK? why? because they can scarp the EU regulations that are not constructive to growth. The can have a better tax system (lower taxes) and they can be different.

yes it's good to be different, why buy from you if you do exactly the same as everybody else? yes different is good.

if UK is out of EU but not close their economy they will do very well.

what they will lose is that they have to be in big airport queues, they will lose money changing their pounds everytime they travel (that was already the case) and they need to ask permission to do business in Europe.


The case Against Education

From Bryan Caplan Blog

I've been in school for the last 35 years - 21 years as a student, the rest as a professor.  As a result, the Real World is almost completely foreign to me.  I don't know how to do much of anything. While I had a few menial jobs in my teens, my first-hand knowledge of the world of work beyond the ivory tower is roughly zero.

I'm not alone.  Most professors' experience is almost as narrow as mine.  If you want to succeed in academia, the Real World is a distraction.  I have a dream job for life because I excelled in my coursework year after year, won admission to prestigious schools, and published a couple dozen articles for other professors to read.  That's what it takes - and that's all it takes.

Considering how studiously I've ignored the Real World, you might think that the Real World would return the favor by ignoring me.  But it doesn't!  I've influenced the Real World careers of thousands of students.  How?  With grades.  At the end of every semester, I test my students to see how well they understand my courses, and grade them from A to F.  Other professors do the same.  And remarkably, employers care about our ivory tower judgments.  Students with lots of A's finish and get pleasant, high-paid jobs.  Students with a lots of F's don't finish and get unpleasant, low-paid jobs.  If that.


.............................................

According to the signaling model, employers reward educational success because of what it shows ("signals") about the student.  Good students tend to be smart, hard-working, and conformist - three crucial traits for almost any job.  When a student excels in school, then, employers correctly infer that he's likely to be a good worker.  What precisely did he study?  What did he learn how to do?  Mere details.  As long as you were a good student, employers surmise that you'll quickly learn what you need to know on the job.


If you take a degree in Latin that does not matter at all if you are going to be a better lawyer/accountant or Banker why pay more to a college student with a degree vs person without a degree?

because the college degree is a signal. yes if this guy was able to take a boring degree in Latin he certainly can learn to do this job. 

Let's hire someone with good marks and a degree in whatever.

Bryan Caplan argues with some reason that education does not matter at all to the way you are going to do your job it's only going to raise the salary for people with a degree and lower for the people without a degree. It's a waste of time for the society because people spend a lot of money and time in Colleges learning nothing useful for the way they will work in the future.

why not close the higher education system?


Execution isn't Everything anymore

you shouldn't do right what shouldn't be done at all

If everybody does the same thing with the same rules you probably should focus on execution. to do well what you are doing is everything.

recently i came to the conclusion that to do the right things matters a lot.

Management is doing things right; leadership is doing the right things


Peter Drucker

you have to pick your battles you have to do things that make sense you have to do sound things.

why? because in the short run anything can happen but in the long run the sound strategy will win. just that simple

exemple:

the companies that opt for science, big data and decision based on facts and information are getting ahead in every dimension. 10 years ago the companies that did this option probably didn't do very differently from the traditional model of management (I do what everybody else does). Amazon, Booking, Facebook etc.... spent many years investing , programming, collecting data etc... and they started slowly but in the long run they will win why?

because they know more


Just do it ...... but not in GOLF

Nike exits GOLF

From Bloomberg

Nike Inc.’s decision to stop selling golf equipment and a possible bankruptcy filing by the Golfsmith retail chain are raising concerns that the declining popularity of the sport is taking a toll on the companies that thrive on it.
Millennials, the key to the sport’s future, are shunning the expensive and time-consuming game in favor of more instantly gratifying pursuits like Pokemon Go and Netflix binges. 

I don't know much about GOLF and i might say some stupid arguments I will give it a try (sorry to the GOLF lovers that are many for sure)

My view is that GOLF is losing popularity for 3 reasons

1. These days there is a bifurcation in the labor market, people who work work like crazy and many people don't have almost nothing to do. The ones that work a lot don't have time for a 5 hour round of GOLF and the ones that don't have a job don't have the money.

2. Many people are struggling and you have to pay each time you want to play vs running or biking.

3.I don't know if this is a stupid reason but when i want to to some mountain-bike i just put my shoes & bike gear and exit for the mountains without having to book anything. Most of the times i find some friends riding and we ride together for 2 or 3 hours. In Golf i guess you have to get a partner and book a exit time. too time consuming.



How Fast You Walk May Predict How Long You’ll Live

From Isis Tsee Life Sciences

Those who walked 1 meter per second (about 2.25 mph) or faster consistently lived longer than others of their age and sex who walked more slowly, the study showed.
"We're able to show that a person's capacity to move strongly reflects vitality and health," said study researcher Dr. Stephanie Studenski, a professor of medicine at the University of Pittsburgh.

However, the researchers also emphasized that the purpose of this study wasn't to get people to walk faster in hopes of living longer.
"Your body chooses the walking speed that is best for you, and that is your speed, your health indicator," Studenski said. "And that's what it really is: an indicator. Going out and walking faster does not necessarily mean you will suddenly live longer. You still need to address the underlying health issues."
The researchers showed they could reliably predict the 10-year survival rate of a group of people based on how fast they walked along a 4-meter track.

I don't agree with this idea that you could change nothing, if you walk faster if you exercise more if you do weights you will live longer. why? because your body improves every time you push it more.

yes you should test your limits and stress your body a bit. The body was designed to run & to chase animals. we were not made to sit and rest. Go out and walk fast. Do that everyday and you will live longer. I don't have any study but i feel that this is the reality.

Move and start today.

Important people don't multitask


This year, I decided to do something radical that I hadn’t done for almost a decade. I took a proper holiday. I disconnected myself from work altogether. I didn’t open any work messages. I spent time reading, walking, looking at the sea — and sometimes getting into it — while I thought about not much at all. When I returned to work and reacquainted myself with email, it was perfectly straightforward. I deleted almost all of them unread, responding only to the things that looked interesting. Far from feeling overwhelmed, I felt a certain excitement in the sudden immersion in work. It was a new-shoes and sharp-pencil sort of feeling that used to go with the beginning of a school term.
Over the past week it has started to dawn on me that my radical action was not radical at all. I was merely following the latest fashion.


Lucy Kellaway, FT


I have noticed during my career that the really important people are not always online and do one thing with 100% focus. The people that multitask sometimes don’t go very far ahead. Perhaps it’s a wrong impression but it’s my experience.

People that multitask are sacrificing Focus for some surprise. It's a big cost.